Atheism, Testimonies

87 episodes and running of atheists becoming Christians and their stories?

Every atheist has a different story but here are quite a few form Side B Stories!

If you are on these streets and want off Jesus way then call 505-346-4673.

God bless and peace to the humble!

25 thoughts on “87 episodes and running of atheists becoming Christians and their stories?”

  1. Atheists can be stupid and join cults. That doesn’t make the cults’ claims true. It always amuses me when christians think conversion stories are impressive when atheists also become muslims, etc. Conversion is nothing special to them.

    Like

    Reply

    1. And there are Christians who become atheists also….

      If truth were but a subjective human invention (as you seem to believe), then all views would be true and false at the same time, therefore I reject this as being even possibly true.

      Jesus is the truth! God bless…

      Like

      Reply

      1. Yep. Which shows your cult not having the magic pull christians claim it does.

        Truth isn’t and nope, I never said it was or intimated it was, a human invention. Truth exists. Your cults lies aren’t truth. You do love to invent strawman to take your stands against. That’s rather pathetic.

        Hmm, which jesus, dear? Christains can’t agree on what their jesus wants, each inventing a different one.

        Like

      2. Ok. Then you do not believe truth is a human invention and that “Truth exists”. I did say that it seemed like you did. Especially when in earlier conversations you talked about right and wrong being a matter of opinion and morality having been invented by humans over the millennia. But I see that this is not the same as truth but rather morality but here is a problem and if I am strawmanning you feel free to call me out.

        So, then let me rephrase it in this way:

        If morality were but a subjective human invention (as you seem to believe but correct if I am wrong), then contradictory views of morality would be true and false at the same time, therefore I reject this as being even possibly true if we want a true morality as opposed to a false morality and since we agree that “Truth exists” we should be seeking the true position on all issues. The atheistic position can’t possibly make for a true morality but can only account for a contradictory morality.

        Take care…

        Like

      3. truth and morality are different, dear. It’s just great to see you fail yet again.

        yep morality is a human invention. It is subjective and morality for a person can’t ge true and false at the same time. Everyone has their opinion. Some morals are common, sincen they benefit everyone, but that doesn’t show they are objective.

        We have a true morality. No one needs your imaginary friend or you to have that. You simply lie and claim only you have a true morality.

        Like

      5. Why does it have to be objective? You have no evidence for it. Some atheists have claimed that there are objective morals, Sam Harris I think, but he also has no evidence for his claims either.

        So we are stuck with subjective morality for me, other atheists and for all theists.

        Like

      7. Because there is no evidence it is not. Still waiting for evidence from you that your version of the christian god exists, that any versions exist and that it gives morals. From what christians claim, it gives many different morals, contradictory and showing that it’s the humans who invent morals, not some imaginary friend.

        And nice to see you can’t answer my questions, TJ.

        Like

      9. Again, dear, no evidence it is not. We see no universal morality in humans. And from the unfortunate case histories of feral children, they show no innate morality. You still fail, TJ, and no evidence for your imaginary friend or that it approves of any set of morals at all.

        Like

      10. So, your evidence that morality is subjective is that we observe this to be the case. Take, for instance abortion. Some people believe killing an unborn human is immoral while others don’t, and so we observe different morals from different people, and therefore, morality is subjective.

        A prochoice individual believes it’s immoral to violate a woman’s right to decide, whereas a prolifer doesn’t.

        So, morality is clearly and observationally subjective, right?

        I think I get your position, but if you hold to this, then I have an objection to make.

        I need to know if this is your position, though, or the objection I make would be unfair to your position or a strawman objection of some sort, and I do not wish to strawman your position.

        Like

      11. And here we go again with TJ’s nonsense. Yep, morality is subjective, dear. We’ve been over this before. You have yet to show your god exists or that it agrees with any particular set of morals invented by any Christians.

        It’s great how you keep failing dear. Repeating asking me the same questions in your desperate attempt to convince yourself that I agree with your lies.

        Hmm, how many times have I told you this and you are evidently too stupid to comprehend:

        “yep morality is a human invention. It is subjective and morality for a person can’t ge true and false at the same time. Everyone has their opinion. Some morals are common, sincen they benefit everyone, but that doesn’t show they are objective.
        We have a true morality. No one needs your imaginary friend or you to have that. You simply lie and claim only you have a true morality.”

        “So we are stuck with subjective morality for me, other atheists and for all theists.”

        Your objection will fail miserably as it always does dear. And still no evidence of objective morality or your god.

        Like

      13. ROFL. Yes, it does, dear. I do enjoy when you have nothing but trying to gaslight me.

        I conclude that morality is a human invention and subjective since there is no evidence otherwise.

        Like

      15. Yep. We know this since it has been humans writing about morality and debating it for millennia. Curious how you still have no evidence for your god’s mere existence, much less that it is the source of morality.

        Like

      16. Now, it is also humans that have been “writing about truth (not just morality) and debating it for millenia” right? So, it seems you would be forced to believe by your own reasoning that truth is a subjective human invention, right?

        Like

      20. So, your position is that humans have been discussing morality and truth for millenia, but only morality is a human invention and not truth?

        Like

      21. Poor TJ, trying so hard to twist my words. How christian of you.

        Why would humans discussing morality make it an objective truth? And again, still nothing to show your morals are objective or come from some imaginary bit of nonsense.

        Like

      22. Just trying to understand your reasoning as to why morality is subjective for you and why truth is not. I see inconsistencies, but you don’t. I’ll let the readers decide for themselves. Take care for now….type at ya later

        Like

      23. No, you aren’t. Still waiting for you to show your god exists and your morality to be from this god and to be objective.

        It’s the typical whine of a christian when they can’t show their lies to be true to claim that the “readers” will decide. You can’t support your claims and have to appeal to imaginary nonsense yet again.

        Like

Leave a comment