Very interesting interview!
“Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.” – Luke 15:10
God bless…If you want off these streets call 505-346-4674!
For another similar and beautiful and great story check out:
1love1god.com 
atheists can be stupid and join cults. That doesn’t mean the cult’s lies are true.
LikeLike
I do not agree that they are being stupid, and here is one of many reasons why. Maybe I will give two of many. Actually, let’s stick with the one.
If atheism is the truth and there is no God and all that there is, is matter (things whether they have mass or not) in motion (maybe sometimes not in motion) and no Creator as Jesus, then that’s all you have. (Mind you, I could use this same argument against a Hindu or Mormon of JW by just replacing the atheistic belief with a necessary contrast to Jesus too but it would be some other disagreement than all there is, is matter in motion.)
This is problematic when it comes to, say, morality or love or justice etc etc. These are things that, at least at an appearance level, are more than just matter in motion. When one kills another innocent human being, we do not act as if we are all in one giant science lab and conclude, “Oh people destroy each other. No different than particles colliding at CERN.”
And if they are just matter in motion, then quit complaining about cults and whatnot. This is just what things full of matter do. All else is but an appearance of right and wrong, morality and love and justice etc etc etc.
Now, where that appearance comes from in an atheists world, God only knows. Oh, but there is no God! It’s a lose lose situation…lol. being silly here!
This is one of many reasons why I trust Jesus. When alternative ideas are expressed and I am told I am this or that for believing in Jesus, like have you have been doing here, I’m like why do you even care? Do you really care for me? Do you really have a reason to care in an atheist world? I don’t see why you would care if atheism were true.
This doesn’t mean that you don’t care about things or even myself, but it does mean that given atheism, there is no basis for you doing so. So, I dismiss your objection to Jesus on the grounds that you, as an atheist, shouldn’t care about this at all nor anything else for that matter if your atheism were true. So you’re kind of a good hypocrite!
So, if I were to make the jump to your side, I would be jumping into a terrible indefensible position. This, to me, would be stupid and sinful all at the same time. I would be going against Jesus (you and my Creator) and for really no good reason at all. So, I would be doubly accountable and then to think of what my Savior did for me at the cross in comparison to any atheist and what not. I would just be adding sin to sin and making really dumb decisions. I would probably conclude that if I did do any such thing, it would be because of some sort of deceitfulness of some sort of sin in my life that would lead me to go away from Jesus and into atheism or any non Jesusism.
Anyhow, as it is written: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
And it is also written: “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God….”
And it is also written: “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
I do not have any reason to believe you will find the truth via atheism. Turn from atheism and trust Jesus and someday I am praying that you will, before the day of judgment because I do care for you as Jesus cared for me in my sinful unbelieving state.
For it is written:
”Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” – Ecclesiastes 12:13,14
And Never Ever Forget Romans 5:8!
Take care and wishing only the best for you as this is posted in prayer for you and anyone else reading!
LikeLike
All you have is pascal’s wager, TJ. Theists also have yet to show that their imaginary friends are necessary for morality or love or justice. Christians have quite a problem in that they can’t agree on what morality their god even wants, each making up their own version. You have the same problem with justice. There is no justice when your god kills people for things they didn’t do. As for love, well, being so petty to need to eternally torture someone for not agreeing with you is what abusers do.
All of these are from the brain, which is “matter in motion”, no soul has been ever detected. It is just a baseless claim. Yep, we have morals, invented by humans and based on empathy and self-interest. Again, no god needed at all.
Sorry, dear, you are in a cult and that is simply an accurate statement. Your attempts to lie about morality fail.
It’s notable that not one christain trusts jesus. If you do, then you’d do as the bible has him demanding, give up all you have and follow him. Depend on this god to provide all you need as per his promises in the lilies speech. You are all hypocrites, TJ.
I care since your lies cause real harm. To you and everyone else. You try again with the same nonsense as before, trying to lie and claim that atheism equals nihilism. It doesn’t and all you have are false claims. I should always care what happens to myself and others. Your lies don’t work.
As usual, nope, youwouldn’t be jumping to a “terrible indefensible position”. Your lies have tried to make it that and you’ve failed miserably. No evidence your jesus is anyone’s creator, and there we have the usual false claims again.
Even if we take your silly cruxifiction story as real, Jesus did nothing but what he wanted. The only one needing a blood sacrifice by torture is your god. It’s notable that christains are at the pinnacle of being irresponsible, needing someone to die for their actions.
And still no evidence of sin or of your god. Yep, your ignorant bible says those things. So? You can’t show them true. I’m as impressed with your baseless nonsense as you would be with a worshipper of Zeus.
I’ve already found truth, TJ. I know you have none. No reason to trust something you can’t show exists. Should I tell you to trust in Allah since Mo said it was true? Of course not, and that’s how ridiculous you sound to me. Your sadistic little fantasies will never come true. You’ll die knowing you’ve failed.
Oh dear! Romans 5
“8 But God proves his love for us in that while we still were sinners Christ died for us.”
Again, I’m quite happy I don’t need someone to be killed for me. Christians are so pitifully selfish. Your prayers still fail and per your own bible, you are a fraud.
LikeLike
You said: “we have morals, invented by humans and based on empathy and self-interest.”
1) Morals are invented by humans? Says who? All you have is matter in motion. How exactly do electrons, protons, neutrons, atoms, reactions, synapses, neurons, grey matter invent. You have to have an inventor to invent. You are, but matter in motion. Where have you seen an electron invent anything. Electrons just are and just do and react, and so if all we are is a compilation of stuff like electrons, then where is it that you observe stuff inventing stuff. Oh, there are reactions for sure, but hardly are they considered to be inventing anything and definitely not inventing morality.
All you have is stuff that somehow begins to speak and talk and invent and contemplate morality and whatnot. Stuff doesn’t do this. Star dust doesn’t do this. We are much more than star dust. But you say that is all we are…
At least the Greeks have Zeus, Christians have Jesus, and Isalm has Allah etc etc etc. They got a whole lot more than atheists got.
Now, if you were a Muslim, I would argue our difference, but you are not. So, I am asking you to make your position better than Zeus.
Now, if one were to argue Zeus, then I would discuss with a Zeusist, but I am talking to an atheist.
As far as there differing views within Christian thought, I would discuss with them our differences, but I am talking to an atheist. And you are talking and trying to convince this Christian.
By the way, there are a wide variety of atheistic thoughts and interpretations. Does this mean atheistic thought is illegitimate. No, of course not. One atheist would argue his view with another, would he not? One may be right and the other wrong. You are arguing with this theist, and I am arguing with this atheist.
Atheists have no inventor, which I see as a huge problem, and I believe I have successfully argued that. You may not like the Christian inventor, but it sure beats what you have.
You judge certain things right and wrong about Jesus and I could argue with you on those points but if you can’t even see how absurd of an idea that inventors are made out of star dust with no inventor then why should consider your moral claims against my view. You have no morality in atheism. You just have star dust. It’s like you have the Adam of the Genesis creation account but no breath of life in him.
He is dust, and that’s it, and dust doesn’t think! There is no way I am jumping to your side. Zeus is a better option than atheism is in this regard, but Jesus is King in all regards, and you have no moral ground as an atheist to judge otherwise.
So, until you can beat even Zeus, I am sticking with King Jesus and I think you should too!
😀
LikeLike
Says reality dear. You can’t show morals come from your imaginary friend. We can see how humans have invented and shaped morality over the millennia. Matter in motion can do a lot of neat things, no god needed. We don’t exactly how consciousness happens, but we are working on it. Funny how Christians have to remain ignorant when it comes to research. We already can determine some thoughts mean just from the electrical signals in the brain. Artifical limbs can be controlled by the brain. Funny how your god can’t do anything at all. All you are are the typical god of the gaps claims. Your personal ignorance doesn’t work as an argument.
We are indeed more than star dust. We are what star dust can become. Still no evidence for your petty ignorant god.
It’s great that now you say “at least” other theists have their gods, when those gods are no worse than yours. They are all imaginary, including the idiotic one from the bible. You have nothing more than I do, dear.
Of course you would argue that your imaginary friend is better than other imaginary friends. And you’d fail as you always do, TJ. My position is already better than Zeus and your god since, again, both are imaginary nonsense. It’s hilarious to see you claim you could prove your god better than Zeus, but alas, you can’t. That’s why you have to keep repeating that you are talking to an atheist, since you know you can’t support your claims to any other theist.
Atheists like me agree on one thing: the conclusion that gods don’t exist. We differ in many other things, but not that. So your attempts to lie and claim that since we differ on other things atheism has to be wrong fails. My point about Christians unable to agree on their “truths” still stands.
The only “Christian inventor”, by which I believe you mean who started christnaity, that exists is humans. Still no evidence for your god. Atheism doesn’t have to have an inventor, since it is a conclusion based on facts. The lack of a god is not “invented” by anyone.
And nope, your rather pitiful appeals to a cult isn’t better than what I have.
I certainly do judge things right and wrong about your imaginary friend, and all of the different versions Christians like you invent. You can’t argue with me on those points since you have nothing, TJ. You, as always, have to make up some excuse about why you can’t present these ever so wonderful arguments you claim to have. You simply lie.
Again, you have no magical source of morality. You cannot show your morality any better than mine or anyone elses, including those Christians who disagree with you. There is no morality in atheism since that is just a conclusion about the existence of gods. Morality comes from humans and various worldviews. My own largely comes from epicureanism. And hmm, which adam dear, you have two contradictory silly stories? Happily, I do have breath in me, and neither your god or you are needed for that.
Dust, in the right configurations does think, and we are both evidence of that. I know you are too ignorant and too cowardly to consider anything but your own cult as right, TJ. Zeus is no more or less real than your imaginary friend. Your continued baseless claims of “jesus is king” are bemusing but no more true for that. Your personal failure to be able to do what jesus promises per your bible is plenty of evidence of your failure. Sorry, dear, no reason to consider your invented jesus any better than the next christian’s.
LikeLike
“Matter in motion can do a lot of neat things.” But matter in motion doesn’t KNOW that it is doing a lot of neat things. Intelligent human beings do!
“We can see how humans have invented and shaped morality over the millenia.” Many evil inventions but if we are not intelligent human beings but just matter in motion we are not inventing anything but are just particles colliding into one another! Star Dust period. And notice you are assuming we are more than just matter in motion when you say “We can see how….”. Matter in motion sees nothing.
“We don”t exactly how consciousness happens.” There is no consciousness if consciousness is just matter in motion.
“thoughts…from electrical signals in the brain.” True but this doesn’t mean thoughts are just electrical signals in the brain and nothing more or else we are truly just star dust and nothing matters at all if this is the case.
“We are what star dust can become.” And what can star dust become? Come on….think this out! The observational science makes this obvious to answer.
“Still no evidence…” for my God you say. I believe I am presenting evidence for my God by showing how absurd the atheistic option is. As far as you are concerned “star dust” can eventually think thru billions of years of evolution. It honestly seems kind of fairytalish. Like a modern day sophisticated myth but really no different then all the crazy myths from the past. Observational science does not bear this out. Where do you observe this? The observational science is consistent with the idea that thinking beings exist and that thinking beings come from prior thinking beings as opposed not non-thinking things. I still hold that atheism is incorrect that man did not come from star dust but rather from earth dust via the most amazing thinking being of all beings without which you would not be! Star dust doesn’t account for thinking beings, but God does!
At least the greeks had a thinking being called Zeus which is better than atheism. But I am not arguing against a Zeusist and I am arguing with you.
“Atheists like me agree on one thing: the conclusion that gods don’t exist…”. Theists like me agree on one thing: the conclusion that the God of the Bible exists. We differ on many things but not that. So your attempts (to lie I scratch out because I do not believe you are purposefully lying) to claim that since we differ on other things theism must be wrong fails.
“Atheism doesn’t have to have an inventor, since it is a conclusion based on facts.” That star dust becomes thinking beings. Is this really one of your facts!
“I certainly do judge things right and wrong about your imaginary friend…” Disagree. You are but star dust! Star dust can’t judge. You are but electrical signals and your thoughts are but electrical signals that can move an artificial limb like a dead frog twitch but it still can’t think or judge or know what is right and wrong. You are just a bunch of electrical impulses and what you claim to be right and wrong is not really right and wrong it is impulse like a lifeless glitched out Adam!
“You can’t argue with me on those points since you have nothing…” Well, we will let the readers decide on that. Atheism has nothing and I have argued for that. If atheism is not true then what are you left with my friend. It must be some form of theism! Now I am not arguing with someone who is knowledgeable in the different Christian views and these are some issues that are discussed and worked on and what not amongst Christians. No different than your atheistic thinkers. But a major difference between theists and atheists is the point in contention and I have made a fair argument for why one should step into the theistic world and work the truth out from a perspective that believes there is actually real truth and not electrical impulses working on star dust etc etc etc….
Zeus is better than atheism in this regard. At least, a Zeusist doesn’t believe thinking beings came from non-thinking things or that thinking beings are just electrical impulses, neurons, synapses, chemistry etc etc etc. Now, I believe Zeus can be easily eliminated but I am not arguing with a Zeusist.
Now lastly you said, “Dust, in the right configurations does think….” only like a robot and robots don’t really think nor have morals nor have justice and love etc etc etc! But thinkers make robots in their image and so they can mimic thinkers but real thinking only comes from a thinker! And all observations are consistent in this.
So, if you and I are but mere robots then we can conclude “we are both evidence of that.” But I hold you and I are more than robots! There is a real right and wrong, morality, truth, love, beauty, justice, grace and mercy and robots don’t get to have those. Only those who are Created in God’s image no matter how genius of a robot they create in their own image in defiance against the obvious conclusing that:
“Adam, created by God in His image does think, and thus we are both evidence of that.” And not star or earth dust alone. Adam has life in him in Christianity but atheism makes us robots and worse at that: robots with not robot maker. And I know that you are maybe ignorant of this but not really. You know…it’s just that you have been lead astray via your own willing sinful flesh and fanciful unGodly imagination which God has given you over to as a just judgment:
As it is written: Romans 1:16-32 but Romans 3:23 but Romans 3:24 and one of my favorite verses of all time Romans 5:8.
Wishing only the best for you, honestly. Even if you never come to know Jesus I wish a good life for you but I really do hope for eternal life for you. I’d rather have you have a terrible life and be saved for all eternity and be able to hang out together discussing issues forever laughing at each others positions. LOL…Just messing…probably won’t be like that at all. But I do wish the bestest for you.
It is a serious matter, though….Take care for now…
LikeLike
Oh dear, more baseless nonsense. The brain is matter in motion and yep, it knows it is doing a lot of neat things. Humans are only intelligent thanks to the brain. You fail again.
No evil inventions, unless you want to count the torture devices used by Christians. Items aren’t evil, people can be. Humans invent, imaginary beings don’t. All you have are more nonsense dependent on baseless presuppositions. We can see and think thanks to matter in motion. So your attempt to lie that I assume we are more than that is fails as usual.
It’s great when you make baseless assertions again and again. Poor dear. Consciousness exists and it is matter in motion. Still no evidence for your imaginary little friend, I see.
Yep, it does mean that thoughts are just electrical signals in the brain since not one ignorant theist has shown them otherwise. Everything matters if we are just star dust. It’s lovely that again you return to your lies about atheism being nihilism again.
Star dust has become humans. And yes, dear, I’ve thought this out. It’s hilarious how you can’t answer your own question. No one needs your imaginary friend to exist. That’s only your baseless opinion.
Yep, still no evidence for your god at all. What you believe makes no difference since you have failed at showing atheism to be “absurd”. Yep, star dust can and has started to think through billions of years. Plenty of evidence for this, still nothing that shows your god exists or is the creator you claim.
I’s great that an ignorant Christian who is too afraid to learn about the science is attacks thinks that his opinion that science is “fairytalish” matters. It’s quite different since we have evidence and sadly, you don’t. Observational science does bear out evolutionary theory, and your ignorance of science has you shooting youself in the metaphorical face yet again.
It’s always fun when ignorant christains claim that I can’t observe something by looking at evidence from the past. That would mean that your creationist nonsense is also up for grabs since you didn’t observe it either, dear. The conditions now aren’t the same when life started. We may never see life come about. Still nothing to show your petty little friend exists.
Yep, you still hold to your baseless nonsense. So? That doesn’t make it true. And it’s so sweet again that you try to claim that it’s better to have an imaginary god like zeus than be an atheist. That seems to make your need for your god nothing more than the greek’s need for Zeus. You can’t argue with a Zeusist since all of your arguments would fail miserably and show how your own god doesn’t exist too.
That’s a hilarious lie, dear: “Theists like me agree on one thing: the conclusion that the God of the Bible exists.” Nope, all theists don’t agree with your Christian nonsense. It’s hilarious how incompetent you are with this. And Christians don’t even agree that they worship the same god, with each inventing a god that wants different things. You disagree on basic details of your religion: free will vs predestination, what morals this god wants, how to interpret the bible, etc. Your attempt to use my argument fails rather amusingly. I know you can’t show that I lie.
Yep, it’s a fact and you, my dear ignorant hypocrite, depend on the science that supports that conclusion for your computer, your cell phone, your gps, etc.
You disagree that I judge your god. ROFL. I am indeed star dust, and star dust in the configuration of a human can judge. Yep, I’m coherent electrical signals that can make decisions. It’s lovely how you make up nonsene to try to cling to your lies, dear. I can judge what is right and wrong, no imaginary friend or TJ needed. It’s not impulse at all, but nice baseless claim yet again, dear.
The readers? Where are there any? As usual, you try to claim that some imaginary being will show that you are right, when you yourself cannot. How typical.
You’ve yet to show your god exists, dear. So why would I need theism? Why would I need to care at all about either side? There are plenty of folks who simply don’t care. They aren’t theists and they aren’t atheists. So you fail yet again.
I do know quite a bit about the differences in Christian views and as usual, Christians don’t’ agree on the most basic things. You aren’t working on anything, you simply claim each other is wrong. Why is your cult continuing to splinter and never comes back together? Hmm?
And atheistic thinkers? Dear, we have one thing in common as I said, we all agree that there is no reason to conclude that gods exist. There is no debate on how something “doesn’t” exist. There is real truth. You have none of it, despite your baseless claims. Me being star dust doesn’t preclude truth.
ROFL. It’s hilarious how you are so desperate that you’ll say any religion is worthwhile as long as someone isn’t an atheist, but that’s a lie too, since you don’t actually think that is true at all. You want everyone to agree with you and only you. You hilariously can’t eliminate Zeus at all. That’s why you won’t even try.
Why only like a robot dear? What evidence do you hve for that particular bit of nonsense you’ve pulled from your nethers? None as usual. You have no idea. Again, you return to the vomit that your god simply must exist and you’ve yet to show that to be true. Nope, all observations aren’t consistent on this since we are still researching. Your god of the gaps excuses fail one more time.
We aren’t robots, and we aren’t made by imaginary nonsesen either, dear. There is one right or wrong since those are subjective opinions. There is no one beauty since humans disagree. There can be truth e.g. facts, and love is a human emotion from the brain and well documented on how the body produces the feeling. No grace or mercy in your bible, or your god, but humans can demonstrate those ideas.
All it comes down to is your baseless assertions and your inability to show your god exists at all.
Atheism makes no one a robot, and again, all you have are baseless claims.
It’s so sweet when you intentionally lie about me, TJ. You are so desperate to pretend I simply must agree with you that you have to ignore your supposed god. If your hell exists there will be no room for atheists with all of the TrueChristians™ there. Your impotent threats are worthless.
and dear, every cult makes the same set of lies in Romans. Your version isn’t any more impressive.
I do enjoy the lies that you wish the best for me. No evidence of that, only a petty failure who need external validation. Desperately hoping I deserve death and worse fails at wanting anything good for me. It’s just sweet when you hope I have a terrible life as long as I agreed with you. You aren’t just messing, you are simply a rather mean human being.
LikeLike
You said: “We aren’t robots….” I agree and that is because we are created in God’s image not because we are “matter in motion”.
Zeus is indeed a better competitor to Genesis 1 and 2 in this regard and I still hold to this. All you got is matter in motion. How is this not a very robotic view of the brain? “The brain is matter in motion….” you said. If that is all an atheist has then you are robotic, a zombie or a Frankenstein but you do not get an Adam from this as Genesis 2 plainly reveals. Maybe even worse then robotic as you have no robot maker or a Frankenstein without its creator so a Zombie would probably be more fitting!
Your arguments solidify for me the need of more than “matter in motion” which Genesis 2 declares. You have man made from star dust like in Genesis 2 but man is more than star dust clearly like in Genesis 2. I believe this discussion has shown that.
You just argue that man’s brain is matter in motion and therefore thoughts. I just don’t buy into that. I believe we have brain waves and electrically charged aspects to us and neurons and synapses and etc etc etc but this doesn’t jump to the conclusion that therefore we think. Therefore, if atheism is true then we are but star dust alone and whatever we do and don’t do doesn’t matter as we are just reacting chemically to our environment and thoughts are not really thoughts they are just wavelengths and electrically charged impulses produced by nothingness in our brains or outside by our environment and therefore we are robots or zombies or Frankenstein and that is all you will ever get via atheism. You don’t get an Adam out this without the Adam maker! God must be and atheism can’t be!
CS Lewis once thought and argued that if this is all we are then why trust our thoughts? I mean it’s a valid point. Especially, when thoughts can be contradictory etc etc. but maybe that is another argument but in the same vein.
Now, we can discuss Christianity and Zeuism and the different Biblical forms of Christianity but my argument is any of these options is far better than we being robots, zombies or Frankenstein’s in this regard, in that they all hold that all is not just “matter in motion” and so they do not have this problem that an atheist has. And you won’t even consider other options without exposing your option as wanting. Why would you consider any other option except atheism if you can’t even honestly judge your own view or except the possibility that atheism leads to a brain of matter in motion and that is all we are.
There are many atheists that believe this is just the way it is and freely admit we have no free will and we are just matter in motion and free will is an illusion. Do you believe that we get free-will out of “matter in motion”?
Matter doesn’t think nor does a combination of matter with motion. That is my position and so we need more than pure materialism/naturalism which is all an atheist has. Atheism is not beyond this skepticism in my opinion and I believe in many other atheists opinion too.
Just like The Great Unconformity is a problem for the geologist to figure out and even an atheist geologist can admit to this. You don’t seem to be able to admit to this fair criticism of atheism. If you look up online on google you will find this is not an easy problem to solve as an atheist. You will find many different answers. Some conclude there is no free-will and others have other answers and I do not believe you will find even a consensus answer to this problem.
Just like The Problem of Induction and problems and challenges of the Cosmological Principle and Big Bang Cosmology and Quantum Physics etc etc etc. They seem to be able to admit there are problems to be solved. You make this atheistic moral issue as if it has been resolved and is so easy to answer. Not so…
Take care….
LikeLike
And yet more false and baseless claims. No evidence for your god, and even Christians can’t agree what “made in his image” even means.
ROFL. Oh dear, a Greek god is better to your bible, and its ignorant creation stories than evidence based science. Unsurprisingly, neither Zeus or your god can be shown to exist so they are pretty much the same set of baseless nonsense.
It’s so sweet that you keep lying and claiming that matter in motion has to be “robotic” and have no evidence to support your assertions. Why is it “robotic”? What do you even mean by “robotic”? Again, no evidence for your ignorant creation myths. Genesis 2 reveals nothing. It makes baseless claims.
Zombies come from causes too. Your god still is MIA.
My argument has nothing to do with your innate ignorance. You can blame yourself for being that. There is no “more” needed. All you want is an job for your imaginary friend. Your discussion has shown you have nothing, just plaintive whines why your imaginary friend just has to exist.
I don’t just argue but show that your cult is a lie and humans are indeed matter in motion with evidence. Who cares what an ignorant man doesn’t buy into whenhe has nothing more than baseless nonsense. Again, all you have is your argument from personal ignorance.
Then you go back yet again to the lies you have told before. Sorry, what we do does matter, no god or TJ needed.
C.S. Lewis was a hilarious failure who advocated that Christians lie to potential converts. It’s great to see how Christians ignore their god when they feel it convenient. Yep, he came up with the pure stupidity that we need his god to know things. He never showed that to be true, just like you. It’s not a valid point at all. Thoughts can be contradictory. The vast amount of the time they are not, and we interact correctly with our environment. No cult’s lies needed.
Oh dear, and more lies from you. Your argument fails since you can’t show tht it is better to believe in imaginary things than it is not. You repeat the same lies over and over throughout this whole post. Repeating lies doesn’t make them true.
There is no free will. It is an illusion but a very good one. Still no god or TJ needed. You still are simply a poor liar.
matter does think, and you keep repeating lies, dear. Your position is simply from your own ignorance and need to feel special. You can’t support your position at all, just like every other cultist.
The Great Unconformity is not a problem, and you again show your typical ignorance. Why would I admit your lies to be true or fair when they aren’t? It’s so sweet when you whine that I dare not agree with your failure. We are currently figuring things out and your god of the gaps claims fail every day.
Unsurprisingly, the problem of induction isn’t a problem, and you believe too much ignorant philosophy which also can’t that its claims are true just like you with your god. What’s even more fun is that induction is all that cultists have.
WE don’t know everything *yet* about the BBT or the cosmological principle. WE are still researching it. We have only about 50 years of research into quantum physics, so again you rely on the usual god of the gaps nonsense. You still fail miserably, and admitting that there is still work to be done doesn’t say your imaginary friend exists.
Then you randomly mention atheistic morality, when it isn’t a problem at all. Poor dear, having to desperately change the subject.
LikeLike
Take care…I am sure we will type at each other again. Laters…
LikeLike
and yep, still no evidence for your imaginary friend, TJ. You end as all cultists do.
LikeLike